+- Invex Gaming - Gaming Community (https://invex.gg)
+-- Forum: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=141)
+--- Forum: Jailbreak (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=137)
+--- Thread: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? (/showthread.php?tid=5324)
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Sir Lagalot - 04-01-2017
Seeing as being a good warden or rebeller is purely subjective I don't see why these extra restrictions are needed. Jailbreak isn't meant to be a game mode where people try really hard to get the most kills or something, it is meant to be fun and people voting for funny people for WOTM and ROTM is just a byproduct of that.
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Masta - 04-01-2017
(04-01-2017/11:04 PM)Sir Lagalot Wrote: Seeing as being a good warden or rebeller is purely subjective I don't see why these extra restrictions are needed. Jailbreak isn't meant to be a game mode where people try really hard to get the most kills or something, it is meant to be fun and people voting for funny people for WOTM and ROTM is just a byproduct of that.
Sir Lagalot Just because u can't get points on JB jeez... but I disagree it may be roleplay more then comp though you can have good and bad roleplayers I just think that the good ones should get some recongnition is all and by adding this I reckon that'll happen. MAKE INVEX GREAT AGAIN!
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Squidward - 04-01-2017
(04-01-2017/11:04 PM)Sir Lagalot Wrote: Seeing as being a good warden or rebeller is purely subjective I don't see why these extra restrictions are needed. Jailbreak isn't meant to be a game mode where people try really hard to get the most kills or something, it is meant to be fun and people voting for funny people for WOTM and ROTM is just a byproduct of that.
but it's just a popularity contest. Remember that there are genuine rewards for this kind of thing and people just believe it's unfair to the people that put in the effort and are good players who don't get the recognition they deserve
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Sir Lagalot - 05-01-2017
(04-01-2017/11:07 PM)Masta Wrote: but I disagree it may be roleplay more then comp though you can have good and bad roleplayers
Yes but you don't understand what I was saying. Deciding whether someone is a 'good' or 'bad' roleplayer is completely subjective so you should be able to vote for that person and not just who the requirements want you to vote for.
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Squidward - 05-01-2017
(05-01-2017/12:17 AM)Sir Lagalot Wrote: Yes but you don't understand what I was saying. Deciding whether someone is a 'good' or 'bad' roleplayer is completely subjective so you should be able to vote for that person and not just who the requirements want you to vote for.
I disagree with all of this. It shouldn't be/isn't subjective. If you are a good rebeller you can rebel and kill the CT's very often, which should get you ROTM. If you're a good warden, you warden frequently and can keep the T's in control/take control of an out of control situation easily, which should get you WOTM. None of that is subjective and is what POTM was meant to be, people just can't take it seriously
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - n8 - 05-01-2017
Basically as it is i can get a bunch of ppl i know to vote for someone who doesn't even play ct. An example would be me nominating Soona, and getting everyone to vote for him, it is kinda a disadvantage on the players who are actually good at wardening/rebelling
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Sir Lagalot - 05-01-2017
(05-01-2017/12:20 AM)Squidward Wrote: I disagree with all of this. It shouldn't be/isn't subjective.
I guess my idea of playing jailbreak is different to yours. I want to vote for the fun wardens who have new interesting ideas and make the game enjoyable and not just those Nazi wardens. If it were to work like you want to we might as well just have a gameme system as what you are saying is just that more kills = better...
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Squidward - 05-01-2017
(05-01-2017/12:38 AM)Sir Lagalot Wrote:(05-01-2017/12:20 AM)Squidward Wrote: I disagree with all of this. It shouldn't be/isn't subjective.
I guess my idea of playing jailbreak is different to yours. I want to vote for the fun wardens who have new interesting ideas and make the game enjoyable and not just those Nazi wardens. If it were to work like you want to we might as well just have a gameme system as what you are saying is just that more kills = better...
for ROTM it's obv all about kills since there's no other aspect to it. As for WOTM I understand where you're coming from but I'm still sticking to my guns. A good warden is someone who knows what they're doing and can make it to LR almost all the time. You don't have to be Nazi to make it to LR, you just have to have good awareness, pay attention, organise guards, give clear and concise orders or even something like taking the safest route to a location so you can actually do thee map game with the T's and have some fun. What you mentioned can also add to being a good warden but if you become too lenient or can't handle 30+ T's the T's will notice that and constantly rebel on you.
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Sir Lagalot - 05-01-2017
(14-09-1974/12:22 PM)Squidward Wrote: A good warden is someone who knows what they're doing and can make it to LR almost all the time.
I think a good warden is one that makes it fun for everyone in the server. These are the people I want to vote for warden of the month. You want to vote for the ones who can 'keep the ts under control'. I don't see why you want to restrict people like me from voting for who we think are the best wardens just because you don't think they are.
RE: Jailbreak POTM New Eligibility Rules? - Squidward - 05-01-2017
(05-01-2017/01:11 AM)Sir Lagalot Wrote:(14-09-1974/12:22 PM)Squidward Wrote: A good warden is someone who knows what they're doing and can make it to LR almost all the time.
I think a good warden is one that makes it fun for everyone in the server. These are the people I want to vote for warden of the month. You want to vote for the ones who can 'keep the ts under control'. I don't see why you want to restrict people like me from voting for who we think are the best wardens just because you don't think they are.
Nononono, now you're missing my point and misquoting me xd my general statement is that it isn't subjective because of the reasons I stated. I never said that being a fun warden doesn't deserve WOTM, I mentioned that a fun warden needs to have the above qualities I mentioned otherwise they'd never be able even make it to a map game. I also never said that I want to restrict people like you from voting. Generally, people have been able to vote for an appropriate WOTM although this month it clearly isn't right. This is why we want to introduce a minimum !pt ct so that people who put in the effort receive the award they deserve.