(25-09-2017/04:59 PM)GeorgeTheBitch Wrote: The t's already have an advantage in lr this rule would give an enourmous upperhand to terrorists. -1 other reasons also stated

(25-09-2017/04:55 PM)Squidward Wrote:

(25-09-2017/04:49 PM)Forgotten Wrote:

(25-09-2017/04:45 PM)Squidward Wrote: I can agree with this, I think it’s dumb to have to wait till the T actually knifes you before you can start to kill them, because they’re gonna have the upper hand if they always get the first knife in. I think you were in the right for killing forgotten, he was clearly attempting rebel but failed in doing so. If someone was trying to knife me but kept failing, I’d kill them 100%

Keep in mind however, that it's a gun vs a knife, it takes 3 shots from a knife to kill a CT while it takes 1 shot from a guard to kill a prisoner instantly (should be even easier as they're close quarters).
@"valence." actually proved this because if I did actually knife him in the situation he killed me instantly anyways, there was no way I was going to get 3 knife shots in.

or they keep trying to knife you until they get 1 backstab? with these rules the guard can’t shoot them the entire time they’re trying to knife the ct’s back which is just dumb

(25-09-2017/05:02 PM)Squidward Wrote:

(25-09-2017/04:59 PM)GeorgeTheBitch Wrote: The t's already have an advantage in lr this rule would give an enourmous upperhand to terrorists. -1 other reasons also stated

you clearly haven’t actually read the suggestion before posting...

(25-09-2017/09:00 PM)Crona Wrote: "cts can say knifing distance is kos during lr" Forgotten ?

(25-09-2017/09:22 PM)PhoeniX Wrote: Neutral, reasons stated