+- Invex Gaming - Gaming Community (https://invex.gg)
+-- Forum: General (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=71)
+---- Forum: Rejected (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+---- Thread: [JAILBREAK] Rule Add - Step Definition (/showthread.php?tid=8310)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Rule Add - Step Definition - PoosKi - 26-09-2017
Look @"Jubbimo", love the effort but it's not needed.
Like Squidward said it comes under common sense and if someone takes a massive leap and starts doing the order, obviously that's not a step right.
But if someone comes out a little bit further than others, e.g takes 3-4 medium steps in stead of one, obviously you wouldn't shoot him.
Overall, if the prisoner is nitpicking and walks have way through main cells and then does the order, feel free to kill them.
But if they go a little bit further out than others,that's when it becomes a free kill.
1-
RE: Rule Add - Step Definition - Leevie - 26-09-2017
(26-09-2017/05:09 AM)PoosKi Wrote: Look @"Jubbimo", love the effort but it's not needed.Yeah this summarises it up well -1
Like Squidward said it comes under common sense and if someone takes a massive leap and starts doing the order, obviously that's not a step right.
But if someone comes out a little bit further than others, e.g takes 3-4 medium steps in stead of one, obviously you wouldn't shoot him.
Overall, if the prisoner is nitpicking and walks have way through main cells and then does the order, feel free to kill them.
But if they go a little bit further out than others,that's when it becomes a free kill.
1-
RE: Rule Add - Step Definition - Byte - 27-09-2017
This rule was considered but not implemented in the latest rule update.
Rule R1 covers this kind of nitpicking.
See all rules here:
https://www.invexgaming.com.au/showthread.php?tid=840