Squidwards Admin App - Printable Version +- Invex Gaming - Gaming Community (https://invex.gg) +-- Forum: Invex Gaming Community (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=110) +--- Forum: Admin Applications (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=119) +---- Forum: Rejected (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=130) +---- Thread: Squidwards Admin App (/showthread.php?tid=4247) |
RE: Squidwards Admin App - stu - 05-10-2016 +1 I've seen you enforce a lot of rules and like what Seth said; You helped with the stoppage of the cancer which is Matty. RE: Squidwards Admin App - n8 - 05-10-2016 +1. Someone that is willing to actually help out, that's something an invex admin needs to have within themselves. Friendly, active and helps new players out. RE: Squidwards Admin App - Jake - 05-10-2016 (04-10-2016/09:19 PM)Masta Wrote: Sorry but i'm gonna go with a -1, I feel like you need a bit more forum time and integration into the community. You haven't been playing for too long either which is a bit of a negative though maybe in 1-2 months i'll go with a +1. You are a bit argumentative too as Ownaj stated previously. Dude. It doesnt matter he has been playing longer than zyster and he got admin lmao RE: Squidwards Admin App - vulture - 05-10-2016 neutral, reasons have been stated RE: Squidwards Admin App - Masta - 05-10-2016 (05-10-2016/11:52 AM)Jake Wrote:(04-10-2016/09:19 PM)Masta Wrote: Sorry but i'm gonna go with a -1, I feel like you need a bit more forum time and integration into the community. You haven't been playing for too long either which is a bit of a negative though maybe in 1-2 months i'll go with a +1. You are a bit argumentative too as Ownaj stated previously. It does, zyster is more of a part of the community, he is constantly and consistently on surf whereas Squidward isn't on JB as much... RE: Squidwards Admin App - Squidward - 05-10-2016 (05-10-2016/04:09 PM)Masta Wrote:(05-10-2016/11:52 AM)Jake Wrote:(04-10-2016/09:19 PM)Masta Wrote: Sorry but i'm gonna go with a -1, I feel like you need a bit more forum time and integration into the community. You haven't been playing for too long either which is a bit of a negative though maybe in 1-2 months i'll go with a +1. You are a bit argumentative too as Ownaj stated previously. I know I'm not meant to say this kind of stuff but I'm on like every day xD RE: Squidwards Admin App - Amy - 05-10-2016 WAIT AREN'T YOU ALL READY ADMIN +1 Great dude, see him helping the server every way he can. But he never slays people RE: Squidwards Admin App - Squidward - 05-10-2016 (05-10-2016/09:45 PM)Amy Wrote: WAIT AREN'T YOU ALL READY ADMIN +1 Great dude, see him helping the server every way he can. Sorry Amy, haven't learnt the admin commands very well yet... RE: Squidwards Admin App - Razor - 06-10-2016 First off this isn't going to be me going "+1 reasons listed" cause I cbf typing. I'm writing this because I believe he 100% deserves admin. I actually aren't sure where the "Argumentative" comes from? Maybe I haven't seen it but I've never seen him like this, but anywho he is always enforcing the rules, has plenty of playtime, (to those saying he isn't very active he's generally on late at night.) Anyways, he displays plenty of admin qualities and should definitely have a chance at trial. +1 RE: Squidwards Admin App - Squidward - 06-10-2016 (06-10-2016/04:03 AM)Razor Wrote: First off this isn't going to be me going "+1 reasons listed" cause I cbf typing. I'm writing this because I believe he 100% deserves admin. I actually aren't sure where the "Argumentative" comes from? Maybe I haven't seen it but I've never seen him like this, but anywho he is always enforcing the rules, has plenty of playtime, (to those saying he isn't very active he's generally on late at night.) Anyways, he displays plenty of admin qualities and should definitely have a chance at trial. +1 Yea, I have argued to Ownaj on 2/3 occasions but I wouldn't do it to casual players like you, dad <3 (04-10-2016/06:13 PM)Seth Wrote: I'm neutral. I haven't been warned for nearly 3 months babe <3 (btw, the latest warn should have been removed for a misunderstanding) |