+- Invex Gaming - Gaming Community (https://invex.gg)
+-- Forum: General (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: Support and Bug Reports (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=116)
+---- Forum: Solved (https://invex.gg/forumdisplay.php?fid=117)
+---- Thread: Retakes 5v4 (/showthread.php?tid=2705)
Pages:
1
2
Retakes 5v4 - brandonn - 23-05-2016
Server never runs 5v5, 10th player would be put in que waiting for another person to leave. Remove que?
RE: Retakes 5v4 - asriel - 23-05-2016
Its fine the way it is imo.
RE: Retakes 5v4 - CHEF - 23-05-2016
I agree with asriel, it's fine how it is now. It's not realistic to have 5 people on a bombsite and 5 people retaking (unless youre C9 vs Fnatic Faceit Milan), and its not even realistic how it is now, I wish there was 3 on site and 4 retaking, but then too many people would have to wait.
RE: Retakes 5v4 - Mourning Wood - 23-05-2016
It's deliberate, holding post-plants is much easy than retaking when played right. 4v5, that way the CT's get a chance.
RE: Retakes 5v4 - Sir Lagalot - 23-05-2016
I do think that the fact that people are stuck in the queue until someone disconnects or until map change can be very annoying. IMO the players should rotate in and out of the queue so that the one person in the queue is different every round
RE: Retakes 5v4 - n8 - 24-05-2016
Ct's always get an advantage in retakes (from what i've seen) and IMO i think it suits it as, t's should face challenges to regain the site, as it wont always be an even playing field (5v5). However someone getting left out does seem extremely unfair for the player missing out. All in all, i think that it's unfair for the player to miss out but i think it would be better than to keep the playing field at 5v5 as it will be near impossible that it will always be that situation.
RE: Retakes 5v4 - Byte - 24-05-2016
Hello World thoughts?
RE: Retakes 5v4 - Righteous - 24-05-2016
Defending teams always have an advantage over attacking teams, why do you think 3 or 2 players can hold a site against 5 players.
RE: Retakes 5v4 - brandonn - 24-05-2016
People playing when i was always ask why it isnt 5v5, i think you guys are thinking to much into it, NEVER will the ct's ever have 5 people retaking unless they let them walk onto the site (like chef said) so there isnt realism in this anyway so you might aswell add the fifth so cts actually have to work and look at all the corners to make sure its clear, and its your ability to retake a site not just cause theres a extra member its impossible to retake, loads of the players are wanting to get better and the way thats going to happen is to pressure them on getting into a site.
RE: Retakes 5v4 - Mourning Wood - 24-05-2016
(24-05-2016/06:13 PM)brandonn Wrote: People playing when i was always ask why it isnt 5v5, i think you guys are thinking to much into it, NEVER will the ct's ever have 5 people retaking unless they let them walk onto the site (like chef said) so there isnt realism in this anyway so you might aswell add the fifth so cts actually have to work and look at all the corners to make sure its clear, and its your ability to retake a site not just cause theres a extra member its impossible to retake, loads of the players are wanting to get better and the way thats going to happen is to pressure them on getting into a site.
It's more to do with trades. For example a game where all 9 players are exactly the same skill level, the T should always get the first trade, and the CT should get the next trade etc. This goes down to where the CT should in theory get the last trade on the T, making it a 1v0. But there is still a bomb to be accounted for, so you can still lose a 1v0 if time runs short. It's the only fair way, 5v5 and the T's (If all the same skill level) should always win unless something bizzare occurs.