Rule Ct1 Wording Change Pls

[Jared Fraser]

Recently after the rule has ben changed therehas been alot of confusion and 2 sides have formed, People who believe that the warden can give orders for prisoners to stay in cells as long as they have left cells by 12:00, and another where they believe the rule states that no rules for prisoners to stay in cells are allowed. This is causing mayhem some rounds when people who havnt read the rules or are unsure on the change and the get yelled at by people who then have an argument against the other sides view on the rule. I think a simple chang of the wording could solve this such as adding a few words in brackets sayng that (No orders to stay in cells may be given) or for the other side (Orders to stay in can be given as long the prisoners leave the cells). Or just change the entire wording in general.

[Leevie]

Byte clarify?

[PhoeniX]

I thought these types of staying inside of cell orders got removed? +1

[Forgotten]

Give orders to prisoners that tell them to come out of cells, CELL ORDERS MUST include orders for prisoners to come out of cells. If there are no cell orders that tell them to come out of cells (e.g. "1 step out button freeze") by 12 then it's a freeday.

[Byte]

Yeah its basically what Forgotten said.
You have to give an order telling the prisoners to leave cells by 12:00.
Now they can leave after 12:00 but you can't say leave at 4:00 for example as that is mass delaying.
However, if you give no orders to leave cells by 12:00 its a freeday.

Also I'd say its common sense/delaying to tell prisoners to re-enter cells after they leave.
Technically its allowed but only if there is some sort of game happening involving cells (like find the empty gun game) etc.
Otherwise, its just delaying.

Overall I think rule wording is fine.

[Jared Fraser]

Byte Forgotten Thanks for the responses I'll just link people who are doing it wrong to this thread if necessary

[Forgotten]

Closed.