10-06-2017/09:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2017/10:16 PM by Dandy. Edited 6 times in total.)
Since he "slayed" that telecamp seems to be justified. Though i have other occurrences
THIS WAS A RANDOM DEMO THAT I PICKED THAT QQ. WAS APART OF:
And i have managed to already get 4 SEPARATE incidents.
http://fastdl.invexgaming.com.au/fastdl/...ex.dem.bz2
Ticks
39130 (qq. blatant telecamp)
78289 (2 telecamps) (doesn't slay for either) by killer (LIMITED) andqq. (BANNED)
97953 (qq. blatant telecamp.)
119406 - Telecamp by stan. with the assist ofqq. (BANNED) (was sitting infront of the teleporter and then killed the enemy that came through) BLATANT
The fact that slaying to qq seems to be a justified reason for all the telecamping is bs. He still gains the points, Leaving him with a win win situation. He CONSTANTLY telecamps.
ALSO I WANT TO RE-STATE THAT THIS WAS A RANDOM DEMO THAT I DOWNLOADED WITH qq IN IT AND I FOUND 4 INCIDENTS LIKE?????????????????????????????????
Sir Lagalot this enough evidence?
THIS WAS A RANDOM DEMO THAT I PICKED THAT QQ. WAS APART OF:
And i have managed to already get 4 SEPARATE incidents.
http://fastdl.invexgaming.com.au/fastdl/...ex.dem.bz2
Ticks
39130 (qq. blatant telecamp)
78289 (2 telecamps) (doesn't slay for either) by killer (LIMITED) and
97953 (qq. blatant telecamp.)
119406 - Telecamp by stan. with the assist of
The fact that slaying to qq seems to be a justified reason for all the telecamping is bs. He still gains the points, Leaving him with a win win situation. He CONSTANTLY telecamps.
ALSO I WANT TO RE-STATE THAT THIS WAS A RANDOM DEMO THAT I DOWNLOADED WITH qq IN IT AND I FOUND 4 INCIDENTS LIKE?????????????????????????????????
Sir Lagalot this enough evidence?