28-10-2017/04:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-10-2017/04:55 PM by Forgotten. Edited 1 time in total.)
Somebody shouldn’t have to mute someone for micspamming when it’s against the rules.
For example: Someone is micspamming on Jailbreak, ‘but it’s fine to do that because CS:GO has a block communication button’.
So don’t bag @“Mathew_1” for making an abuse report on Jae when he was breaking the rules.
And how many times do I have to tell you all not to make irrelevant posts DONT make replies if:
1. You’re making a joke about something, save that for shoutbox, not here.
2. You’re responding to something that DOESNT have any additional information/evidence to add.
3. Don’t even reply at all if you weren’t there and weren’t apart of the situation, however; an exception to this is if you’re confirming if someone has done the same thing in a previous event/time.
4. Suggesting someone to do something that is one sided, for example; a lot of people in this thread talked about how @“Mathew_1” could’ve just ‘muted him’, of course this is one sided as you’re doing this in favour of Jae.
You CAN make replies if:
1. You’re confirming something.
2. You have additional evidence to add such as demo ticks, a YouTube video that shows the target of the abuse report breaking a rule, or a screenshot.
3. Find out more about when you can and cannot make irrelevant replies here.
And THAT IS ALL.
Can a staff please warn everyone who has made an irrelevant reply in this thread, as I’m quite sick of deleting numerous posts.
Byte ev0 Tick
For example: Someone is micspamming on Jailbreak, ‘but it’s fine to do that because CS:GO has a block communication button’.
So don’t bag @“Mathew_1” for making an abuse report on Jae when he was breaking the rules.
And how many times do I have to tell you all not to make irrelevant posts DONT make replies if:
1. You’re making a joke about something, save that for shoutbox, not here.
2. You’re responding to something that DOESNT have any additional information/evidence to add.
3. Don’t even reply at all if you weren’t there and weren’t apart of the situation, however; an exception to this is if you’re confirming if someone has done the same thing in a previous event/time.
4. Suggesting someone to do something that is one sided, for example; a lot of people in this thread talked about how @“Mathew_1” could’ve just ‘muted him’, of course this is one sided as you’re doing this in favour of Jae.
You CAN make replies if:
1. You’re confirming something.
2. You have additional evidence to add such as demo ticks, a YouTube video that shows the target of the abuse report breaking a rule, or a screenshot.
3. Find out more about when you can and cannot make irrelevant replies here.
And THAT IS ALL.
Can a staff please warn everyone who has made an irrelevant reply in this thread, as I’m quite sick of deleting numerous posts.
Byte ev0 Tick
none of ur goddamn business