[NOT UNBANNED] CT Unban

[fluxxx]

You personally selected who ever you wanted to play a game that will kill us.

Everyone was confused, you never said the others had to do it aswell, you just straight up told us that only the selected people had to do the game.

I was going to have every one play the game before 4Ts decided to rebel and thus were kos if you had went with it and found it unfair an abuse report would be the appropriate action but instead you had rebelled. The orders were repeated when asked for.

did you watch the clip?

[Razor]

As a witness I seen you break the rules and then receieve a fair 60 minute CTban I suggest next time having some sort of game before this to either kill T's to make it fair or to give T's a prize such as sitting out. You can't split 7 T's evenly.

[Sleep]

As a witness I seen you break the rules and then receieve a fair 60 minute CTban I suggest next time having some sort of game before this to either kill T's to make it fair or to give T's a prize such as sitting out. You can't split 7 T's evenly.

Is it against the rules to split a group of Ts to play a game 4/3? No it isn't no where do the rules come close to saying this. I wanted for all the Ts to play the game and and not have anyone sit out. If I had of let someone e.g by winning freezebomb pick the groups of 3/4 would I have been banned? Kaos

[IAmDora]

As a witness I seen you break the rules and then receieve a fair 60 minute CTban I suggest next time having some sort of game before this to either kill T's to make it fair or to give T's a prize such as sitting out. You can't split 7 T's evenly.

Is it against the rules to split a group of Ts to play a game 4/3? No it isn't no where do the rules come close to saying this. I wanted for all the Ts to play the game and and not have anyone sit out. If I had of let someone e.g by winning freezebomb pick the groups of 3/4 would I have been banned? Kaos

Sleep  honestly i don't want to be involved but i believe if it is a game/mapgame where killing is involved i believe that it would be unfair, just like any sports game. As seen in the video there was slight signs of favourtism inside of the clip. Just be grateful that you only got a 60 minute please.

[fluxxx]

As a witness I seen you break the rules and then receieve a fair 60 minute CTban I suggest next time having some sort of game before this to either kill T's to make it fair or to give T's a prize such as sitting out. You can't split 7 T's evenly.

Is it against the rules to split a group of Ts to play a game 4/3? No it isn't no where do the rules come close to saying this. I wanted for all the Ts to play the game and and not have anyone sit out. If I had of let someone e.g by winning freezebomb pick the groups of 3/4 would I have been banned? Kaos

No it isn't fair. The 4 group would have to defend againt 3 other Ts and the 3 group again 2 other Ts therefore making it easier for the 4 T split making it unfair.

[Sleep]

As a witness I seen you break the rules and then receieve a fair 60 minute CTban I suggest next time having some sort of game before this to either kill T's to make it fair or to give T's a prize such as sitting out. You can't split 7 T's evenly.

Is it against the rules to split a group of Ts to play a game 4/3? No it isn't no where do the rules come close to saying this. I wanted for all the Ts to play the game and and not have anyone sit out. If I had of let someone e.g by winning freezebomb pick the groups of 3/4 would I have been banned? Kaos

No it isn't fair. The 4 group would have to defend againt 3 other Ts and the 3 group again 2 other Ts therefore making it easier for the 4 T split making it unfair.

In  the end this actually has no relevance as we never ended up "unfairly" playing the map game as the Ts rebelled anyway.

[fluxxx]

Wasn't rebelling, they were telling you that it was unfair and favouritism and you started killing them (the ones that didn't rush when supposed to)

[Sleep]

Wasn't rebelling, they were telling you that it was unfair and favouritism and you started killing them (the ones that didn't rush when supposed to)

The orders were 100% valid, there was nothing wrong with the orders given and thus they were rebelling.

[fluxxx]

Not really they were favouritism as stated in the last 2 pages of comments which an admin Kaos was trying to tell you and then you killed him

[Silver Smurf]

Not really they were favouritism as stated in the last 2 pages of comments which an admin Kaos was trying to tell you and then you killed him

While it is technically right that it was favouritism when T's disobey orders because the game is unfair then the warden can kill them as it is counted as rebelling. Within the context of the round he was justified but what needs to be discussed is whether the game was fair or not and if it wasn't then it warrants a CT ban for freekilling and an unfair game. It's better to limit the conversation to the topic of the game being fair or not.