[JAILBREAK] Map exploit rule needs to be added

[jynxx]

+1 well needded

[Triple]

+1, would be good.

[vulture]

if it needs jetpack on something inside the map like a tree or a light that hangs from the roof or a sign on a wall i think is fine but something on a building outside the map i would consider map exploiting, or being able to see through walls. just my opinon

[Kaos]

Agree with Vulture. If it's just like a sign or something inside a building or on a wall it's fine, but getting on the roofs of Renegade for example is map exploiting IMO.

[Deamo]

+1 good idea but mean the admins will need to discuss and work out wat is map exploiting on each map etc

[Ownaj]

Deamo it's really simple from my pov. Use jetpack to get to a spot that is UNREACHABLE without jetpack/map exploits = map map exploiting.

[Squidward]

if it needs jetpack on something inside the map like a tree or a light that hangs from the roof or a sign on a wall i think is fine but something on a building outside the map i would consider map exploiting, or being able to see through walls. just my opinon

But then the problem arises that T's can't rebel that CT which is unfair, vulture

[Silver Smurf]

We need to figure out a good system. If we remove spots that require jetpack from JB completely it may be worse than creating a list on the admin section of spots you aare not allowed to be at. If it would help I wouldn't mind even going through each map and screenshotting places so we have a documented thread with all of the spots and we can decide as a team about which spots should be allowed when. If this isn't an option then just ban JP spots completely. Hello World

[asriel]

i agree with silver smurfs

[Ownaj]

Let me just make this clear. "Using jetpack to get to a spot that is UNREACHABLE without jetpack/map exploits = map exploiting." This is a simple solution and completely covers map exploitation. Why waste time logging a bunch of places you dont want people to go when that one sentence is enough?