22-01-2017/09:06 PM
Byte wouldn't gun planting during lr period come under interfering with lr ?
Thread Rating:
|
LR Gun Planting Conflict
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: 448
Threads: 72 Likes Received: 119 in 79 posts Likes Given: 58 Joined: Sep 2016 Reputation: 20 PlayTime: 32 days, 3 hours, 6 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:0:79201829 Discord Tag: Crona#6559
Posts: 3,184
Threads: 196 Likes Received: 574 in 434 posts Likes Given: 1,000 Joined: May 2016 Reputation: 120 PlayTime: 39 days, 5 hours, 58 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:0:149441697 Discord Tag: Cammm#4560
22-01-2017/09:13 PM
I agree with Byte, just extend CT31 to say 'except in or period'.
none of ur goddamn business
Posts: 1,416
Threads: 95 Likes Received: 694 in 409 posts Likes Given: 503 Joined: Jun 2016 Reputation: 80 PlayTime: 44 days, 9 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:1:155920491 Discord Tag: Squidward#0732
22-01-2017/09:17 PM
(22-01-2017/09:13 PM)Forgotten Wrote: I agree with Byte, just extend CT31 to say 'except in or period'. but what's the point/gain? 
Posts: 545
Threads: 43 Likes Received: 236 in 134 posts Likes Given: 164 Joined: Apr 2016 Reputation: 39 PlayTime: 71 days, 12 hours, 29 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:0:188213645 Discord Tag: Kaos#2425
22-01-2017/09:19 PM
IMO the only reason a CT should give their gun to a T is when the T needs to kill a delaying CT while no Admins are online.
Posts: 1,479
Threads: 49 Likes Received: 472 in 343 posts Likes Given: 42 Joined: Apr 2016 Reputation: 40 PlayTime: 23 days, 14 hours, 15 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:0:121008943 Discord Tag: jiquiorra#9185
22-01-2017/09:23 PM
um if ts can get guns from armoury whats the point in restricting a ct giving him a gun?
Posts: 1,416
Threads: 95 Likes Received: 694 in 409 posts Likes Given: 503 Joined: Jun 2016 Reputation: 80 PlayTime: 44 days, 9 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:1:155920491 Discord Tag: Squidward#0732
22-01-2017/10:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 22-01-2017/10:23 PM by Squidward. Edited 3 times in total.)
(22-01-2017/09:23 PM)asriel Wrote: um if ts can get guns from armoury whats the point in restricting a ct giving him a gun? rather than that, you go to the root of the question and ask why you'd give them a gun at all? I often won't go to armoury as a T when I do an LR although if a CT were to hand me a gun, especially if I lose, ofc I'm gonna use it? The point of JB is also to part roleplay so why would a guard hand a gun to a prisoner? I seriously don't understand why this is even a question when there is literally no point in doing it
Posts: 1,479
Threads: 49 Likes Received: 472 in 343 posts Likes Given: 42 Joined: Apr 2016 Reputation: 40 PlayTime: 23 days, 14 hours, 15 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:0:121008943 Discord Tag: jiquiorra#9185
Posts: 5,210
Threads: 696 Likes Received: 706 in 384 posts Likes Given: 466 Joined: Jan 2015 Reputation: 160 PlayTime: 36 days, 21 hours, 50 minutes SteamID: STEAM_1:1:74070914 Discord Tag: Byte#0017
23-01-2017/12:51 AM
(22-01-2017/10:22 PM)Squidward Wrote:(22-01-2017/09:23 PM)asriel Wrote: um if ts can get guns from armoury whats the point in restricting a ct giving him a gun? Its about giving CT/T freedom. Once you get the !lr period its basically round over. If the T's want to just rebel, whatever, they miss out on !lr'ing. So its meant to be a more relaxed, chill period where the T doesn't have to follow orders etc (just has to LR in time). Thus, the T can go armoury to get guns (or pick up nearby dropped guns) Thus, there is no point restricting CT's from 'gunplanting' when T's can easily pick up guns anyway. They can even point it right at a CT's head and they are still not KOS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![[+]](https://invex.gg/images/revolution/collapse_collapsed.png)
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 2 Guest(s) |